哲学史-philosophy of history(英文版)-第11部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！

object　of　History　in　a　more　definite　shape　than　before；　that　in　which　Freedom　obtains　objectivity；
and　lives　in　the　enjoyment　of　this　objectivity。　For　Law　is　the　objectivity　of　Spirit；　volition　in　its　true
form。　Only　that　will　which　obeys　law；　is　free；　for　it　obeys　itself　…　it　is　independent　and　so　free。
When　the　State　or　our　country　constitutes　a　munity　of　existence；　when　the　subjective　will　of
man　submits　to　laws；　…　the　contradiction　between　Liberty　and　Necessity　vanishes。　The　Rational
has　necessary　existence　as　being　the　reality　and　substance　of　things；　and　we　are　free　in　recognising
it　as　law；　and　following　it　as　the　substance　of　our　own　being。　The　objective　and　the　subjective　will
are　then　reconciled；　and　present　one　identical　homogeneous　whole。　For　the　morality　（Sittlichkeit）
of　the　State　is　not　of　that　ethical　（moralische）　reflective　kind；　in　which　one's　own　conviction　bears
sway；　this　latter　is　rather　the　peculiarity　of　the　modern　time；　orality　is　based
on　the　principle　of　abiding　by　one's　duty　＇to　the　state　at　large＇。　An　Athenian　citizen　did　what　was
required　of　him；　as　it　were　from　instinct；　but　if　I　reflect　on　the　object　of　nay　activity；　I　must　have
the　consciousness　that　my　will　has　been　called　into　exercise。　But　morality　is　Duty　…　substantial
Right　…　a　〃second　nature〃　as　it　has　been　justly　called；　for　the　first　nature　of　man　is　his　primary
merely　animal　existence。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　42

The　development　in　extenso　of　the　Idea　of　the　State　belongs　to　the　Philosophy　of　Right；　but　it
must　be　observed　that　in　the　theories　of　our　time　various　errors　are　current　respecting　it；　which
pass　for　established　truths；　and　have　bee　fixed　prejudices。　We　will　mention　only　a　few　of
them；　giving　prominence　to　such　as　have　a　reference　to　the　object　of　our　history。　The　error　which
first　meets　us　is　the　direct　contradictory　of　our　principle　that　the　state　presents　the　realisation　of
Freedom；　the　opinion；　viz。；　that　man　is　free　by　nature；　but　that　in　society；　in　the　State　…　to　which
nevertheless　he　is　irresistibly　impelled　…　he　must　limit　this　natural　freedom。　That　man　is　free　by
Nature　is　quite　correct　in　one　sense；　viz。；　that　he　is　so　according　to　the　Idea　of　Humanity；　but　we
imply　thereby　that　lie　is　such　only　in　virtue　of　his　destiny　…　that　he　has　an　undeveloped　power　to
bee　such；　for　the　〃Nature〃　of　an　object　is　exactly　synonymous　with　its　〃Idea。〃　But　the　view　in
question　imports　more　than　this。　When　man　is　spoken　of　as　〃free　by　Nature；〃　the　mode　of　his
existence　as　well　as　his　destiny　is　implied。　His　merely　natural　and　primary　condition　is　intended。　In
this　sense　a　〃state　of　Nature〃　is　assumed　in　which　mankind　at　large　are　in　the　possession　of　their
natural　rights　with　the　unconstrained　exercise　and　enjoyment　of　their　freedom。　This　assumption　is
not　indeed　raised　to　the　dignity　of　the　historical　fact；　it　would　indeed　be　difficult；　were　the　attempt
seriously　made；　to　point　out　any　such　condition　as　actually　existing；　or　as　having　ever　occurred。
Examples　of　a　savage　state　of　life　can　be　pointed　out；　but　they　are　marked　by　brutal　passions　and
deeds　of　violence；　while；　however　rude　and　simple　their　conditions；　they　involve　social
arrangements　which　（to　use　the　mon　phrase）　restrain　freedom。　That　assumption　is　one　of
those　nebulous　images　which　theory　produces；　an　idea　which　it　cannot　avoid　originating；　but　which
it　fathers　upon　real　existence；　without　sufficient　historical　justification。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　43

What　we　find　such　a　state　of　Nature　to　be　in　actual　experience；　answers　exactly　to　the　Idea　of　a
merely　natural　condition。　Freedom　as　the　ideal　of　that　which　is　original　and　natural；　does　not　exist
as　original　and　natural。　Rather　must　it　be　first　sought　out　and　won；　and　that　by　an　incalculable
medial　discipline　of　the　intellectual　and　moral　powers。　The　state　of　Nature　is；　therefore；
predominantly　that　of　injustice　and　violence；　of　untamed　natural　impulses；　of　inhuman　deeds　and
feelings。　Limitation　is　certainty　produced　by　Society　and　the　State；　but　it　is　a　limitation　of　the　mere
brute　emotions　and　rude　instincts；　as　also；　in　a　more　advanced　stage　of　culture；　of　the
premeditated　self…will　of　caprice　and　passion。　This　kind　of　constraint　is　part　of　the　instrumentality
by　which　only；　the　consciousness　of　Freedom　and　the　desire　for　its　attainment；　in　its　true　…　that　is
Rational　and　Ideal　form　…　can　be　obtained。　To　the　Ideal　of　Freedom；　Law　and　Morality　are
indispensably　requisite：　and　they　are　in　and　for　themselves；　universal　existences；　objects　and　aims；
which　are　discovered　only　by　the　activity　of　thought；　separating　itself　from　the　merely　sensuous；
and　developing　itself；　in　opposition　thereto；　and　which　must　on　the　other　hand；　be　introduced　into
and　incorporated　with　the　originally　sensuous　will；　and　that　contrarily　to　its　natural　inclination。　The
perpetually　recurring　misapprehension　of　Freedom　consists　in　regarding　that　term　only　in　its
formal；　subjective　sense；　abstracted　from　its　essential　objects　and　aims；　thus　a　constraint　put　upon
impulse；　desire；　passion　…　pertaining　to　the　particular　individual　as　such　…　a　limitation　of　caprice　and
self…will　is　regarded　as　a　fettering　of　Freedom。　We　should　on　the　contrary　look　upon　such
limitation　as　the　indispensable　proviso　of　emancipation。　Society　and　the　State　are　the　very
conditions　in　which　Freedom　is　realised。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　44

We　must　notice　a　second　view；　contravening　the　principle　of　the　development　of　moral　relations
into　a　legal　form。　The　patriarchal　condition　is　regarded　…　either　in　reference　to　the　entire　race　of
man；　or　to　some　branches　of　it　…　as　exclusively　that　condition　of　things；　in　which　the　legal　element　is
bined　with　a　due　recognition　of　the　moral　and　emotional　parts　of　our　nature；　and　in　which
justice　as　united　with　these；　truly　and　really　influences　the　intercourse　of　the　social　units。　The　basis
of　the　patriarchal　condition　is　the　family　relation；　which　develops　the　primary　form　of　conscious
morality；　succeeded　by　that　of　the　State　as　its　second　phase。　The　patriarchal　condition　is　one　of
transition；　in　which　the　family　has　already　advanced　to　the　position　of　a　race　or　people；　where　the
union；　therefore；　has　already　ceased　to　be　simply　a　bond　of　love　and　confidence；　and　has　bee
one　of　plighted　service。　We　must　first　examine　the　ethical　principle　of　the　Family。　The　Family　may
be　reckoned　as　virtually　a　single　person；　since　its　members　have　either　mutually　surrendered　their
individual　personality；　（and　consequently　their　legal　position　towards　each　other；　with　the　rest　of
their　particular　interests　and　desires）　as　in　the　case　of　the　Parents；　or　have　not　yet　attained　such　an
independent　personality；　…　（the　Children；　…　who　are　primarily　in　that　merely　natural　condition
already　mentioned。）　They　live；　therefore；　in　a　unity　of　feeling；　love；　confidence；　and　faith　in　each
other。　And　in　a　relation　of　mutual　love；　the　one　individual　has　the　consciousness　of　himself　in　the
consciousness　of　the　other；　he　lives　out　of　self；　and　in　this　mutual　self…renunciation　each　regains　the
life　that　had　been　virtually　transferred　to　the　other；　gains；　in　fact；　that　other's　existence　and　his　own；
as　involved　with　that　other。　The　farther　interests　connected　with　the　necessities　and　external
concerns　of　life；　as　well　as　the　development　that　has　to　take　place　within　their　circle；　i。e。　of　the
children　constitute　a　mon　object　for　the　members　of　the　Family。　The　Spirit　of　the　Family　…　the
Penates　…　form　one　substantial　being；　as　much　as　the　Spirit　of　a　People　in　the　State；　and　morality　in
both　cases　consists　in　a　feeling；　a　consciousness；　and　a　will；　not　limited　to　individual　personality
and　interest；　but　embracing　the　mon　interests　of　the　members　generally。　But　this　unity　is　in　the
case　of　the　Family　essentially　one　of　feeling；　not　advancing　beyond　the　limits　of　the　merely
natural。　The　piety　of　the　Family　relation　should　be　respected　in　the　highest　degree　by　the　State；
by　its　means　the　State　obtains　as　its　members　individuals　who　are　already　moral　（for　as　mere
persons　they　are　not）　and　who　in　uniting　to　form　a　state　bring　with　them　that　sound　basis　of　a
political　edifice　…　the　capacity　of　feeling　one　with　a　Whole。　But　the　expansion　of　the　Family　to　a
patriarchal　unity　carries　us　beyond　the　ties　of　blood…relationship　…　the　simply　natural　elements　of
that　basis；　and　outside　of　these　limits　the　members　of　the　munity　must　enter　upon　the　position
of　independent　personality。　A　review　of　the　patriarchal　condition；　in　extenso；　would　lead　us　to
give　special　attention　to　the　Theocratical　Constitution。　The　head　of　the　patriarchal　clan　is　also　its
priest。　If　the　Family　in　its　general　relations；　is　not　yet　separated　from　civic　society　and　the　state；　the
separation　of　religion　from　it　has　also　not　yet　taken　place；　and　so　much　the　less　since　the　piety　of
the　hearth　is　itself　a　profoundly　subjective　state　of　feeling。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　45

We　have　considered　two　aspects　of　Freedom；　…　the　objective　and　the　subjective；　if；　therefore；
Freedom　is　asserted　to　consist　in　the　individuals　of　a　State　all　agreeing　in　its　arrangements　it　is
evident　that　only　the　subjective　aspect　is　regarded。　The　natural　inference　from　this　principle　is；　that
no　law　can　be　valid　without　the　approval　of　all。　This　difficulty　is　attempted　to　be　obviated　by　the
decision　that　the　minority　must　yield　to　the。　majority；　the　majority　therefore　bear　the　sway。　But
long　ago　J。　J。　Rousseau　remarked；　that　in　that　case　there　would　be　no　longer　freedom；　for　the　will
of　the　minority　would　cease　to　be　respected。　At　the　Polish　Diet　each　single　member　had　to　give
his　consent　before　any　political　step　could　be　taken；　and　this　kind　of　freedom　it　was　that　ruined　the
State。　Besides；　it　is　a　dangerous　and　false　prejudice；　that　the　People　alone　have　reason　and
insight；　and　know　what　justice　is；　for　each　popular　faction　may　represent　itself　as　the　People；　and
the　question　as　to　what　constitutes　the　State　is　one　of　advanced　science；　and　not　of　popular
decision。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　46

If　the　principle　of　regard　for　the　individual　will　is　recognised　as　the　only　basis　of　political　liberty；
viz。；　that　nothing　should　be　done　by　or　for　the　State　to　which　all　the　members　of　the　body　politic
have　not　given　their　sanction；　we　have；　properly　speaking；　no　Constitution。　The　only　arrangement
that　would　be　necessary；　would　be；　first；　a　centre　having　no　will　of　its　own　but　which　should　take
into　consideration　what　appeared　to　be　the　necessities　of　the　State；　and；　secondly；　a　contrivance
for　calling　the　members　of　the　State　together；　for　taking　the　votes；　and　for　performing　the
arithmetical　operations　of　reckoning　and　paring　the　number　of　votes　for　the　different
propositions；　and　thereby　deciding　upon　them。　The　State　is　an　abstraction；　having　even　its　generic
existence　in　its　citizens；　but　it　is　an　actuality；　and　its　simply　generic　existence　must　embody　itself　in
individual　will　and　activity。　The　want　of　government　and　political　administration　in　general　is　felt；
this　necessitates　the　selection　and　separation　from　the　rest　of　those　who　have　to　take　the　helm　in
political